For a new site, I was comparing the performance of the $10 plans for Linode, DigitalOcean (DO) and Vultr.
\nFor the tests I used a freshly deployed CentOS 7 image.<\/p>\n
Here are the results.<\/p>\n
Vultr results:<\/p>\n System Info OS\t\t: \\S Speedtest (IPv4 only) Location\t\tProvider\tSpeed Atlanta, GA, US\t\tColoat\t\t2.74MB\/s Tokyo, Japan\t\tLinode\t\t8.41MB\/s Rotterdam, Netherlands\tid3.net\t\t175MB\/s Disk Speed DigitalOcean results:<\/p>\n System Info OS\t\t: \\S Speedtest (IPv4 only) Location\t\tProvider\tSpeed Atlanta, GA, US\t\tColoat\t\t14.0MB\/s Tokyo, Japan\t\tLinode\t\t8.92MB\/s Rotterdam, Netherlands\tid3.net\t\t98.2MB\/s Disk Speed (another test a day after gives me better disk speed results) Linode results:<\/p>\n System Info OS\t\t: \\S Speedtest (IPv4 only) Location\t\tProvider\tSpeed Atlanta, GA, US\t\tColoat\t\t344KB\/s Tokyo, Japan\t\tLinode\t\t9.20MB\/s Rotterdam, Netherlands\tid3.net\t\t71.8MB\/s Disk Speed Sysbench results:<\/p>\n Vultr<\/strong><\/p>\n Test execution summary: Threads fairness: DigitalOcean<\/strong><\/p>\n Test execution summary: Threads fairness: Linode<\/strong><\/p>\n Test execution summary: Threads fairness: Vultr<\/p>\n sysbench --test=fileio --file-total-size=10G prepare Read 4.0823Gb Written 2.7216Gb Total transferred 6.8039Gb (23.224Mb\/sec)<\/p>\n DigitalOcean<\/p>\n Read 11.05Gb Written 7.3669Gb Total transferred 18.417Gb (62.862Mb\/sec)<\/p>\n Linode<\/p>\n Read 7.2308Gb Written 4.8206Gb Total transferred 12.051Gb (41.134Mb\/sec)<\/p>\n dd if=\/dev\/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync<\/p>\n Vultr DigitalOcean Linode And finally unixbench results:<\/p>\n Vultr: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dhrystone 2 using register variables 25157442.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX DigitalOcean:<\/p>\n OS: GNU\/Linux -- 3.10.0-327.28.2.el7.x86_64 -- #1 SMP Wed Aug 3 11:11:39 UTC 2016 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dhrystone 2 using register variables 26098639.1 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Linode:<\/p>\n OS: GNU\/Linux -- 4.6.5-x86_64-linode71 -- #2 SMP Fri Jul 29 16:16:25 EDT 2016 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Dhrystone 2 using register variables 26811136.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX Memory read speed: Memory write speeds: File I\/O: ApacheBench tests (different scenarios, connect\/processing\/waiting\/total) Vultr: DO: Linode: Sysbench mysql performance:<\/p>\n Vultr:<\/p>\n OLTP test statistics: Test execution summary: Threads fairness: DigitalOcean:<\/p>\n OLTP test statistics: Test execution summary: Threads fairness: Linode:<\/p>\n OLTP test statistics: Test execution summary: Threads fairness: Conclusion: Regarding the plans, DO gives the most disk space, Linode offers 2GB of memory. And not discussed and not yet fully tested, OVH, gives a really competitive price (but horrible support). In terms of uptime, I have been using Linode and DO for quite a while and uptime is very good. I don't have experience with OVH but read uptime is good, but when things happen it may not be fixed quickly due to the bad customer support. You can use the following referral links: For a new site, I was comparing the performance of the $10 plans for Linode, DigitalOcean (DO) and Vultr. For the tests I used a freshly deployed CentOS 7 image. Here are the results. wget freevps.us\/downloads\/bench.sh -O - -o \/dev\/null|bash Vultr results: System Info ----------- Processor : Virtual CPU 714389bda930 CPU Cores : 1 Frequency … Continued<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":2937,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_exactmetrics_skip_tracking":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_active":false,"_exactmetrics_sitenote_note":"","_exactmetrics_sitenote_category":0,"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2834","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-etcetera"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/roderik.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2834","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/roderik.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/roderik.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/roderik.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/roderik.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2834"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/roderik.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2834\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2855,"href":"https:\/\/roderik.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2834\/revisions\/2855"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/roderik.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2937"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/roderik.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2834"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/roderik.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2834"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/roderik.net\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2834"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}wget freevps.us\/downloads\/bench.sh -O - -o \/dev\/null|bash<\/code><\/p>\n
\n-----------
\nProcessor\t: Virtual CPU 714389bda930
\nCPU Cores\t: 1
\nFrequency\t: 2399.996 MHz
\nMemory\t\t: 992 MB
\nSwap\t\t: MB
\nUptime\t\t: 11:23,<\/p>\n
\nArch\t\t: x86_64 (64 Bit)
\nKernel\t\t: 3.10.0-327.22.2.el7.x86_64<\/p>\n
\n---------------------<\/p>\n
\nCDN\t\t\tCachefly\t252MB\/s<\/p>\n
\nDallas, TX, US\t\tSoftlayer\t17.0MB\/s
\nSeattle, WA, US\t\tSoftlayer\t12.4MB\/s
\nSan Jose, CA, US\tSoftlayer\t13.0MB\/s
\nWashington, DC, US\tSoftlayer \t23.3MB\/s<\/p>\n
\nSingapore \t\tSoftlayer\t10.7MB\/s<\/p>\n
\nHaarlem, Netherlands\tLeaseweb\t131MB\/s<\/p>\n
\n----------
\nI\/O (1st run)\t: 410 MB\/s
\nI\/O (2nd run)\t: 475 MB\/s
\nI\/O (3rd run)\t: 472 MB\/s
\nAverage I\/O\t: 452.333 MB\/s<\/p>\n
\n-----------
\nProcessor\t: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630L v2 @ 2.40GHz
\nCPU Cores\t: 1
\nFrequency\t: 2399.998 MHz
\nMemory\t\t: 993 MB
\nSwap\t\t: MB
\nUptime\t\t: 7 min,<\/p>\n
\nArch\t\t: x86_64 (64 Bit)
\nKernel\t\t: 3.10.0-327.28.2.el7.x86_64<\/p>\n
\n---------------------<\/p>\n
\nCDN\t\t\tCachefly\t109MB\/s<\/p>\n
\nDallas, TX, US\t\tSoftlayer\t14.0MB\/s
\nSeattle, WA, US\t\tSoftlayer\t11.7MB\/s
\nSan Jose, CA, US\tSoftlayer\t11.9MB\/s
\nWashington, DC, US\tSoftlayer \t18.2MB\/s<\/p>\n
\nSingapore \t\tSoftlayer\t8.72MB\/s<\/p>\n
\nHaarlem, Netherlands\tLeaseweb\t107MB\/s<\/p>\n
\n----------
\nI\/O (1st run)\t: 229 MB\/s
\nI\/O (2nd run)\t: 611 MB\/s
\nI\/O (3rd run)\t: 615 MB\/s
\nAverage I\/O\t: 485 MB\/s<\/p>\n
\nDisk Speed
\n----------
\nI\/O (1st run)\t: 801 MB\/s
\nI\/O (2nd run)\t: 809 MB\/s
\nI\/O (3rd run)\t: 825 MB\/s
\nAverage I\/O\t: 811.667 MB\/s<\/p>\n
\n-----------
\nProcessor\t: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz
\nCPU Cores\t: 1
\nFrequency\t: 2499.976 MHz
\nMemory\t\t: 1999 MB
\nSwap\t\t: 255 MB
\nUptime\t\t: 5 min,<\/p>\n
\nArch\t\t: x86_64 (64 Bit)
\nKernel\t\t: 4.6.5-x86_64-linode71
\nHostname\t: localhost.localdomain<\/p>\n
\n---------------------<\/p>\n
\nCDN\t\t\tCachefly\t103MB\/s<\/p>\n
\nDallas, TX, US\t\tSoftlayer\t10.3MB\/s
\nSeattle, WA, US\t\tSoftlayer\t11.1MB\/s
\nSan Jose, CA, US\tSoftlayer\t10.5MB\/s
\nWashington, DC, US\tSoftlayer \t9.38MB\/s<\/p>\n
\nSingapore \t\tSoftlayer\t8.00MB\/s<\/p>\n
\nHaarlem, Netherlands\tLeaseweb\t127MB\/s<\/p>\n
\n----------
\nI\/O (1st run)\t: 349 MB\/s
\nI\/O (2nd run)\t: 639 MB\/s
\nI\/O (3rd run)\t: 621 MB\/s
\nAverage I\/O\t: 536.333 MB\/s<\/p>\n
\nwget ftp:\/\/ftp.gnome.org\/mirror\/fedora\/epel\/6\/x86_64\/sysbench-0.4.12-5.el6.x86_64.rpm
\nwget http:\/\/downloads.mysql.com\/archives\/mysql-5.1\/MySQL-shared-compat-5.1.49-1.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
\nrpm -iv MySQL-shared-compat-5.1.49-1.rhel5.x86_64.rpm
\nyum install postgresql-libs.x86_64
\nyum install libaio
\nrpm -iv sysbench-0.4.12-5.el6.x86_64.rpm
\nsysbench --test=cpu --cpu-max-prime=20000 run
\n<\/code><\/p>\n
\n total time: 35.0111s
\n total number of events: 10000
\n total time taken by event execution: 35.0052
\n per-request statistics:
\n min: 3.34ms
\n avg: 3.50ms
\n max: 9.91ms
\n approx. 95 percentile: 3.97ms<\/p>\n
\n events (avg\/stddev): 10000.0000\/0.00
\n execution time (avg\/stddev): 35.0052\/0.00<\/p>\n
\n total time: 36.0255s
\n total number of events: 10000
\n total time taken by event execution: 36.0202
\n per-request statistics:
\n min: 3.50ms
\n avg: 3.60ms
\n max: 7.41ms
\n approx. 95 percentile: 3.72ms<\/p>\n
\n events (avg\/stddev): 10000.0000\/0.00
\n execution time (avg\/stddev): 36.0202\/0.00<\/p>\n
\n total time: 33.0205s
\n total number of events: 10000
\n total time taken by event execution: 33.0150
\n per-request statistics:
\n min: 3.20ms
\n avg: 3.30ms
\n max: 4.79ms
\n approx. 95 percentile: 3.60ms<\/p>\n
\n events (avg\/stddev): 10000.0000\/0.00
\n execution time (avg\/stddev): 33.0150\/0.00<\/p>\n
\nsysbench --test=fileio --file-total-size=10G --file-test-mode=rndrw --init-rng=on --max-time=300 --max-requests=0 run<\/p>\n
\n1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.79991 s, 383 MB\/s<\/p>\n
\n1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.67239 s, 402 MB\/s<\/p>\n
\n1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.11328 s, 508 MB\/s<\/p>\n
\n OS: GNU\/Linux -- 3.10.0-327.22.2.el7.x86_64 -- #1 SMP Thu Jun 23 17:05:11 UTC 2016
\n Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
\n Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=\"ANSI_X3.4-1968\", collate=\"ANSI_X3.4-1968\")
\n CPU 0: Virtual CPU 714389bda930 (4800.0 bogomips)
\n x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER\/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL\/SYSRET
\n 14:29:19 up 14:49, 1 user, load average: 0.11, 0.21, 0.13; runlevel 3<\/p>\n
\nBenchmark Run: Wed Aug 24 2016 14:29:19 - 14:57:30
\n1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests<\/p>\n
\nDouble-Precision Whetstone 3398.6 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
\nExecl Throughput 3366.7 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
\nFile Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 775273.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
\nFile Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 232559.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
\nFile Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1703258.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
\nPipe Throughput 1469168.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
\nPipe-based Context Switching 288856.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
\nProcess Creation 9735.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
\nShell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4499.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
\nShell Scripts (8 concurrent) 616.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
\nSystem Call Overhead 3391541.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)<\/p>\n
\nDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 25157442.5 2155.7
\nDouble-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3398.6 617.9
\nExecl Throughput 43.0 3366.7 783.0
\nFile Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 775273.5 1957.8
\nFile Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 232559.4 1405.2
\nFile Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1703258.9 2936.7
\nPipe Throughput 12440.0 1469168.9 1181.0
\nPipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 288856.7 722.1
\nProcess Creation 126.0 9735.4 772.7
\nShell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4499.6 1061.2
\nShell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 616.2 1027.0
\nSystem Call Overhead 15000.0 3391541.4 2261.0
\n ========
\nSystem Benchmarks Index Score 1243.6<\/p>\n
\n Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
\n Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=\"ANSI_X3.4-1968\", collate=\"ANSI_X3.4-1968\")
\n CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630L v2 @ 2.40GHz (4800.0 bogomips)
\n x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER\/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL\/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
\n 14:29:21 up 3:33, 1 user, load average: 0.05, 0.10, 0.08; runlevel 3<\/p>\n
\nBenchmark Run: Wed Aug 24 2016 14:29:21 - 14:57:32
\n1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests<\/p>\n
\nDouble-Precision Whetstone 3307.5 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
\nExecl Throughput 2911.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
\nFile Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 674322.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
\nFile Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 188424.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
\nFile Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1389987.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
\nPipe Throughput 1283145.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
\nPipe-based Context Switching 239740.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
\nProcess Creation 9055.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
\nShell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4274.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
\nShell Scripts (8 concurrent) 574.3 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
\nSystem Call Overhead 1906295.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)<\/p>\n
\nDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 26098639.1 2236.4
\nDouble-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3307.5 601.4
\nExecl Throughput 43.0 2911.9 677.2
\nFile Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 674322.2 1702.8
\nFile Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 188424.5 1138.5
\nFile Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1389987.5 2396.5
\nPipe Throughput 12440.0 1283145.3 1031.5
\nPipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 239740.3 599.4
\nProcess Creation 126.0 9055.2 718.7
\nShell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4274.3 1008.1
\nShell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 574.3 957.1
\nSystem Call Overhead 15000.0 1906295.5 1270.9
\n ========
\nSystem Benchmarks Index Score 1072.1<\/p>\n
\n Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
\n Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=\"ANSI_X3.4-1968\", collate=\"ANSI_X3.4-1968\")
\n CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2680 v3 @ 2.50GHz (5001.3 bogomips)
\n x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER\/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL\/SYSRET
\n 14:29:25 up 3:27, 1 user, load average: 0.09, 0.12, 0.06; runlevel 3<\/p>\n
\nBenchmark Run: Wed Aug 24 2016 14:29:25 - 14:57:34
\n1 CPU in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests<\/p>\n
\nDouble-Precision Whetstone 3606.7 MWIPS (9.8 s, 7 samples)
\nExecl Throughput 3641.4 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
\nFile Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 778346.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
\nFile Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 238780.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
\nFile Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1403650.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
\nPipe Throughput 1746356.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
\nPipe-based Context Switching 331115.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
\nProcess Creation 10366.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
\nShell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4770.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
\nShell Scripts (8 concurrent) 637.2 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
\nSystem Call Overhead 1948338.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)<\/p>\n
\nDhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 26811136.6 2297.4
\nDouble-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3606.7 655.8
\nExecl Throughput 43.0 3641.4 846.8
\nFile Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 778346.6 1965.5
\nFile Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 238780.9 1442.8
\nFile Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1403650.8 2420.1
\nPipe Throughput 12440.0 1746356.9 1403.8
\nPipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 331115.4 827.8
\nProcess Creation 126.0 10366.3 822.7
\nShell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4770.7 1125.2
\nShell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 637.2 1062.0
\nSystem Call Overhead 15000.0 1948338.8 1298.9
\n ========
\nSystem Benchmarks Index Score 1238.3<\/p>\n
\nVultr: 1570.24 MB\/sec
\nDO: 959.19 MB\/sec
\nLinode: 2623.73 MB\/sec<\/p>\n
\nVultr: 1577.46 MB\/sec
\nDO: 967.22 MB\/sec
\nLinode: 2582.84 MB\/sec<\/p>\n
\nVultr: 1792.35 Requests\/sec
\nDO: 4727.58 Requests\/sec
\nLinode: 3700.33 Requests\/sec<\/p>\n
\nVultr and DO perform really well, Linode stays a bit behind here. <\/p>\n
\nApache test page:
\n13\/22\/21\/35
\n4\/5\/5\/10
\nNginx test page:
\n6\/5\/4\/11
\n4\/4\/4\/9
\nNginx phpinfo
\n5\/24\/6\/29
\n4\/19\/5\/23
\nNginx php benchmark
\n5\/21211\/21211\/21216
\n5\/20991\/20991\/20997
\nNginx php benchmark (php 7)
\n12\/7190\/7190\/7201
\n5\/7152\/7152\/7158
\nWordpress base install (1000, 10)
\n30\/177\/177\/208
\n5\/164\/163\/174
\njQuery file (1000, 5)
\n1\/173\/12\/174 - 0\/164\/11\/164
\n0\/94\/6\/94 - 0\/88\/6\/88<\/p>\n
\nApache test page:
\n22\/10\/9\/32
\n4\/5\/4\/9
\nNginx test page:
\n6\/6\/5\/12
\n4\/4\/4\/9
\nNginx phpinfo
\n6\/23\/7\/28
\n4\/18\/6\/22
\nNginx php benchmark
\n4\/24508\/24507\/24512
\n4\/24494\/24494\/24498
\nNginx php benchmark (php 7)
\n34\/10636\/10636\/10670
\n5\/10689\/10689\/10708
\nWordpress base install (1000, 10)
\n25\/211\/211\/236
\n5\/205\/205\/214
\njQuery file (1000, 5)
\n0\/181\/11\/181
\n0\/84\/5\/84<\/p>\n
\nApache test page:
\n19\/17\/16\/36
\n11\/12\/11\/23
\nNginx test page:
\n14\/14\/14\/28
\n11\/11\/11\/22
\nNginx phpinfo:
\n14\/53\/15\/67
\n11\/45\/12\/56
\nNginx php benchmark (php 5.4):
\n30\/19564\/19564\/19595
\n12\/19437\/19437\/19448
\nNginx php benchmark (php 7)
\n28\/6809\/6809\/6838
\n13\/6775\/6775\/6830<\/p>\n
\n queries performed:
\n read: 548912
\n write: 0
\n other: 78416
\n total: 627328
\n transactions: 39208 (653.37 per sec.)
\n deadlocks: 0 (0.00 per sec.)
\n read\/write requests: 548912 (9147.13 per sec.)
\n other operations: 78416 (1306.73 per sec.)<\/p>\n
\n total time: 60.0092s
\n total number of events: 39208
\n total time taken by event execution: 479.8611
\n per-request statistics:
\n min: 8.74ms
\n avg: 12.24ms
\n max: 61.87ms
\n approx. 95 percentile: 16.32ms<\/p>\n
\n events (avg\/stddev): 4901.0000\/16.42
\n execution time (avg\/stddev): 59.9826\/0.00<\/p>\n
\n queries performed:
\n read: 492716
\n write: 0
\n other: 70388
\n total: 563104
\n transactions: 35194 (586.54 per sec.)
\n deadlocks: 0 (0.00 per sec.)
\n read\/write requests: 492716 (8211.50 per sec.)
\n other operations: 70388 (1173.07 per sec.)<\/p>\n
\n total time: 60.0032s
\n total number of events: 35194
\n total time taken by event execution: 479.8444
\n per-request statistics:
\n min: 6.53ms
\n avg: 13.63ms
\n max: 27.70ms
\n approx. 95 percentile: 15.71ms<\/p>\n
\n events (avg\/stddev): 4399.2500\/12.09
\n execution time (avg\/stddev): 59.9805\/0.00<\/p>\n
\n queries performed:
\n read: 543802
\n write: 0
\n other: 77686
\n total: 621488
\n transactions: 38843 (647.29 per sec.)
\n deadlocks: 0 (0.00 per sec.)
\n read\/write requests: 543802 (9062.07 per sec.)
\n other operations: 77686 (1294.58 per sec.)<\/p>\n
\n total time: 60.0086s
\n total number of events: 38843
\n total time taken by event execution: 479.7662
\n per-request statistics:
\n min: 1.31ms
\n avg: 12.35ms
\n max: 57.53ms
\n approx. 95 percentile: 22.19ms<\/p>\n
\n events (avg\/stddev): 4855.3750\/22.64
\n execution time (avg\/stddev): 59.9708\/0.01<\/p>\n
\nDigitalOcean scores the best for file I\/O.
\nLinode scores the best for memory I\/O.
\nVultr has the fastest network speed in NL.<\/p>\n
\nI am also thinking of testing\/benchmarking OVH, Hostsailor and TransIP in the near future.<\/p>\n
\nVultr ($20 off)<\/a>
\nLinode<\/a>
\nDigitalOcean (get $10 off)<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"